Editor’s note: Mike Merson here, Jeff’s longtime managing editor.

One of the biggest challenges new traders face is the sheer number of markets, sectors, and stocks available to trade. They have no idea where to begin… and become paralyzed.

So today, we’re featuring insights from renowned hedge fund trader Larry Benedict – who says new traders just need to commit to one simple practice to overcome this paralysis…

(To learn more about Larry… like how he was able to run a 20-year win streak from 1990 to 2010… and generate hundreds of millions of dollars in that time… click here to sign up for his tell-all video
documentary series with just one click
.)


When I started out trading, I wanted to be a master of the universe. I wanted to trade, and beat, every single market sector. The indexes, bonds, currencies, soybeans… you name it. I just wanted to outperform everything and everyone. 

I bet you can imagine how that turned out.

Reality came crashing down… and I learned that it’s just not possible. The main thing I realized was you run into a lot of problems when you have too many positions.

It’s common thinking that you should invest a small amount of money into a wide array of assets. But, I’m not a buy-and-hold kind of person. I just don’t have that kind of patience. 

While it would be great to see a 100% return on an investment in 50 years, let’s say, one out of 40 stocks in your portfolio… I want to see that same overall return, over and over again, in the course of a week. 

You see, I prefer to see small gains on a frequent basis, rather than big gains I have to wait decades for. This way, I can steadily grow my cash pile and have some of that money to trade now, rather than later. And as I like to say: the bigger your account, the larger your growth opportunity. 

While I’m usually not putting as much money towards each trade as someone might put towards one long-term investment, my mentality has always been about slowly grinding out profits. It started out slow for me. In my first year, I was trading to earn maybe $100 per position, if I was lucky.

But nowadays, I’m trading much bigger lots and making $1 million here, $4 million there, and another $5 million there… 

And here’s the thing… those returns are still “small” on a percentage basis. It’s just that my capital pile is much bigger now… and so are my position sizes.

When long-term investors say they have a portfolio of 40-odd stocks, that looks dangerous to me. What do you do the day all 40 are down? Which one are you going to look at salvaging first?

How could someone look at 40 stocks every day or week and have a broad range of exceptional knowledge of each and every one? The answer is they don’t. It’s impossible.

For starters, there’s a difference between how many stocks you should become an expert on and how many positions you should put on. 

It’s wise to become an expert on just a handful of stocks… around 5-10. And when you’re just starting out, you should have no more than 2-5 trades going at any given time… five being your absolute maximum.

 A trader should know everything about the stock they’re trading. What it means when the stock is weak and the market is strong, or vice versa. When its earnings calls are, how it reacts to certain news stories, the risk profile, etc. 

So if your stock is performing better than the market, you likely want to be buying that stock. If your stock is performing worse than the market, you probably want to be selling that stock. 

This is something I’ve implemented my entire career. Back in the day, when I was working at different firms, each trader always had one sector. There was an oil trader, a tech trader, a healthcare trader… everyone was an expert on their respective sector. Even in the trading pits, no one traded more than one stock.

You would stand in the pit of just one stock and trade it all day. 

So, I wasn’t trading tech because “Steve” was trading tech and it seemed like a winner. I stuck to what I knew. And at the time, that was the top 20-50 blue-chip stocks. I watched them every single day. 

So, if I were trading Apple, I’d know every move Apple has made. I wouldn’t need a chart to tell me where it’s headed. I would know everything, top to bottom, about Apple.

Now, knowing those 20-50 stocks like the back of my hand took some time. Even learning everything about Apple took time. So, when you’re starting out, pick just one stock of one company and learn everything you can about it. Get to the point where you can anticipate its next move… where it becomes part of your intuition.

Then, do it again… and again… until you have a solid repertoire of stocks that you know better than anyone. And once you do, you’ll be leagues ahead of most other traders out there.

Regards,

Larry Benedict
Editor, Trading With Larry Benedict

P.S. All my career, I’ve mostly traded for myself and high-net-worth clients of my hedge fund. But I’m at the point where I’m more looking to give back… and teach new traders how I was able to become such a success when starting with so little.

The first step to that is my upcoming Trade-a-Thon on Wednesday at 8 p.m. ET, where I’ll reveal the results of a challenge to generate at least $70,000 in a single trading session, with all proceeds going to charity.

(For your convenience, you can sign up to watch the Trade-a-Thon with just one click right here.)

Plus, all who attend will receive a free copy of my Foolproof 50. It’s a great resource for the new trader who’s trying to look past all the noise and focus on a handpicked group of stocks that I personally trade all the time. Sign up right here, and claim your copy on Wednesday, December 11 at 8 p.m. E.T.